- 2 - all expenses allocable and apportionable to the integrated product; i.e., bottle and can soft drink. 3. Held further, sec. 1.936-6(b)(1), Q&A-12, Income Tax Regs., requires U.S. affiliate expenses allocable and apportionable to the integrated product, i.e., bottle and can soft drink, to be determined under sec. 1.861-8, Income Tax Regs., as described in sec. 1.936-(6)(b)(1), Q&A-1, Income Tax Regs. 4. Held, further, P may net interest income against interest expense in determining the amount of the interest deduction to be allocated and apportioned in computing combined taxable income under sec. 936, I.R.C., and sec. 1.861-8(e)(2), Income Tax Regs. Bowater Inc. v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 207 (1993). Charles W. Hall, William S. Lee, Nancy T. Bowen, William P. McClure, Herman B. Bouma, and Gregory J. Ossi, for petitioner. Beth Williams, H. Steven New, and David P. Fuller, for respondent. OPINION WRIGHT, Judge: This matter is before the Court on petitioner's motion for partial summary judgment filed under Rule 121.1 This case was heard at a motions session held on February 1Unless otherwise indicated, all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, and all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect during the years in issue.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011