Computervision International Corp. - Page 53

                                       - 53 -                                         
          be considered a capital asset.  Consequently, our inquiry will              
          focus on whether or not the stock warrant in issue constituted a            
          trade discount given CV by Sun for the purchase of                          
          workstations.17                                                             
               Consideration of the facts and circumstances surrounding the           
          transaction between Sun and CV concerning the granting of the               
          second warrant leads us to conclude that the second warrant                 
          constituted a trade discount from Sun to CV related to the                  
          purchase of workstations.  Respondent presented the testimony of            
          James Berrett, who was CV’s president at the time of the                    
          negotiation of the agreements for the purchase of the                       
          workstations and the issuance of the warrants.  He testified                
          that, although the warrants were not a significant component of             
          the agreements between CV and Sun, they were an incentive for the           

          17                                                                          
               Petitioners contend that respondent abandoned on brief the             
          argument originally advanced in respondent’s trial memorandum               
          that the warrants in issue were within the inventory exception to           
          the definition of capital asset, sec. 1221(1), and suggest that             
          respondent is raising a new theory on brief by arguing that the             
          stock warrants constituted a trade discount.  We consider                   
          respondent’s argument on brief, however, to be merely a                     
          development of the determination in the notice of deficiency,               
          which was that the net proceeds from the sale of the Sun warrants           
          were taxable “as ordinary income or as a decrease to cost of                
          goods sold.”  We also disagree with petitioners that respondent             
          has conceded that a portion of the amount realized on the sale of           
          the warrants is taxable as long-term capital gain.  Respondent              
          merely stated on brief, that, in the event we decided that the              
          appropriate time for recognition of the trade discount afforded             
          by the warrants was the date on which the warrants were first               
          exercisable, respondent would concede that the excess of the sale           
          price over their value on that date was gain from the sale or               
          exchange of a capital asset.                                                




Page:  Previous  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011