Arthur B. Crozier - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
          addition to tax for that year under section 6651(a) in the amount           
          of $304.2                                                                   
          Background                                                                  
               At the time petitioner filed the petition, he indicated                
          therein that his address was New York, New York.                            
               In her motion, respondent represents various facts, none of            
          which petitioner has disputed, including the following.3                    
               On June 23, 1995, respondent filed an answer denying the               
          allegations in the petition, including petitioner's allegation              
          that assessment of the tax determined in the notice of deficiency           
          (notice) is barred by the applicable statute of limitations.  The           
          answer also affirmatively alleged that the applicable statute of            
          limitations did not preclude assessment of the tax determined in            
          the notice because petitioner failed to file an income tax return           
          for the year at issue.                                                      
               On January 30, 1996, respondent sent a letter to petitioner            
          that invited him to a conference on February 5, 1996, and infor-            
          mally requested that petitioner bring various documents to that             
          conference and engage in informal discussions necessary to the              
          preparation of this case.  That letter also advised petitioner              
          that if the date set for the conference was inconvenient, he                


          2  Respondent also determined interest on those amounts as                  
          provided by law.                                                            
          3  Although the Court ordered petitioner to file a response to              
          respondent's motion, he failed to do so.                                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011