- 11 - decided, based on the particular facts of that case, not to exercise our discretion under Rule 41(a) in petitioners' favor. As indicated, respondent relies on Bob Hamric Chevrolet, Inc. v. United States, 849 F. Supp. 500 (W.D. Tex. 1994), for the proposition that an NOL adjustment is properly treated as an affected item subject to computational adjustment. In Bob Hamric Chevrolet, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra, the taxpayer reported a partnership loss in 1982 of $199,813.85 reflecting the taxpayer's distributive share of a loss incurred by a TEFRA partnership for that year. Due to limitations imposed under the "at-risk" rules, the taxpayer claimed a loss of $100,000 on its 1982 income tax return, and carried the balance of the loss forward to 1983 to offset its distributive share of income from the TEFRA partnership for that year in the amount of $86,518. As a result, the taxpayer claimed a net partnership loss for 1983 of $12,596. Following an examination of the TEFRA partnership by the IRS for 1982 and 1983, the taxpayer entered into a settlement agreement reducing its distributive share of partnership loss for 1982. In this regard, the settlement agreement provided that the taxpayer's distributive share of partnership loss for 1982 would be reduced from $199,813.35 to $69,934.67. The settlement agreement also provided that the taxpayer's distributive share of partnership income for 1983 would remain unchanged.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011