Laurel Ann Curtis - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Laurel Ann Curtis, pro se.                                             
               Brenda M. Fitzgerald, for respondent.                                  

                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION                                   
               HALPERN, Judge:  By four separate notices of deficiency,               
          each dated March 20, 1995, respondent determined deficiencies in            
          petitioner’s Federal income tax and additions to tax under                  
          sections 6651(a)(1) (failure to file tax return) and 6654(a)                
          (failure to pay estimated tax) as follows:                                  

                                                  Additions to Tax                    
                                                 Sec.            Sec.                 
                Year         Deficiency       6651(a)(1)        6654(a)               
                1983          $4,533           $1,133            $277                 
                1984           5,098            1,275             321                 
                1985           5,863            1,466             336                 
                1986           10,619           2,655             513                 
                1987           11,578           2,895             624                 
                1988           11,156           2,789             713                 
                1989           12,748           3,187             865                 
                1990           13,969           3,492             920                 
                1991           12,141           3,035             698                 
                1992           22,074           5,519             964                 
                1993           17,493           4,373             732                 

          In addition to determining whether these deficiencies in tax and            
          additions to tax should be sustained, we must determine whether             
          petitioner must pay to the United States a penalty under section            
          6673(a)(1) on account of instituting or maintaining proceedings             
          primarily for delay or taking positions that are frivolous or               
          groundless.                                                                 







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011