Estate of Myrtle V. Dietz, Deceased, Edward A. Dietz, III, Executor - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         

               Throughout the estate's brief, the estate speaks of section            
          2041(b)(2) applying to lapsed powers in all years, including                
          those in the year of a taxpayer's death.  The estate cites Estate           
          of Noland v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1984-209, for this                    
          proposition.  We agree that section 2041(b)(2) applies to lapsed            
          powers in all years.  Our holding in Estate of Noland v.                    
          Commissioner is in accordance with that.  In that case we held              
          that "under section 2041(b)(2), the amount includible in the                
          gross estate in this case for each of the years 1973 through 1978           
          is limited to the amount, if any, by which the lapsed portion of            
          the power exceeded $5,000."3  Id.  (Emphasis added.)  What the              
          estate fails to grasp in the instant case is that, at the time of           
          decedent's death on July 12, 1992, her power over the final                 
          year's amount had not yet lapsed.                                           
          Section 20.2041-3(d)(3), Estate Tax Regs.                                   
               Respondent's treatment of the final year's amount follows an           
          example given in section 20.2041-3(d)(3), Estate Tax Regs., which           
          the estate says is inconsistent with section 2041(b)(2).  That              
          example reads:                                                              
               For example, assume that A transferred $200,000 worth                  
               of securities in trust providing for payment of income                 

          3 In that case the year of decedent's death was 1978, and                   
          respondent did not determine any deficiency in estate tax (nor              
          seek any increased deficiency from the Tax Court) in regard to              
          the 1978 amount that had not lapsed at the time of her death in             
          1978.  Thus we did not directly address the issue that is                   
          presented in the instant case.                                              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011