Charles J. Dugan - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          $1,000.  An IRS computer-generated report dated June 9, 1995,               
          indicates that a substitute return was prepared for the tax year            
          ended 1991 on June 24, 1993.  The substitute return reported                
          petitioner's adjusted gross income as $39,453 and his taxable               
          income as $23,741.  A notice of deficiency dated October 19,                
          1993, was subsequently mailed to petitioner.  IRS records reflect           
          that no return was filed by petitioner for 1991 prior to the                
          issuance of the statutory notice of deficiency.  Petitioner                 
          timely filed his petition in this Court on January 18, 1994.                
               On April 15, 1994, respondent's Appeals Office received a              
          purported copy of petitioner's 1991 return.  The return reflects            
          adjusted gross income of $39,453 and taxable income of $23,741.             
          The return bears an original signature and date of April 12,                
          1993, next to the signature line.  The return claimed married               
          filing separate return status.  On March 30, 1995, the IRS                  
          District Director in Camden, New Jersey, received petitioner's              
          amended 1991 return.  The amended return claimed married filing             
          joint return status.  The parties now agree that petitioner and             
          his wife, Diane Dugan, intended this document to be a joint                 
          return for 1991.                                                            
               (c)  Presumption of Correctness                                        
               Petitioner argues that he timely filed his 1991 return and             
          that respondent's determination that he failed to file should not           
          be accorded the normal presumption of correctness.  Petitioner              
          suggests that, as a result of a past history of the IRS' making             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011