- 8 - B. Whether All or One-Half of the Remaining $120,059 Is Includable in Petitioner’s Gross Income The parties dispute how much of the remaining $120,059 is petitioner’s gross income. Petitioner contends that he owned only 50 percent of the stock of Elan and that, at most, one-half of the remaining $120,059 is includable in his gross income because Elan was an S corporation in 1990. Respondent contends that petitioner owned all of the stock of Elan. Respondent also contends that, even if petitioner owned only one-half of the stock of Elan, all of the remaining $120,059 is income to him. 1. Whether Petitioner Owned All or One-Half of the Stock of Elan We are not convinced that petitioner owned only 50 percent of the stock of Elan. In 1995, petitioner signed Elan's 1990 corporate tax return, which states that he owned 100 percent of the common stock. He also authorized his former spouse to sign Elan's New York City and State returns for 1985, which state he was the only shareholder of Elan who owned more than 5 percent of Elan's stock. Petitioner testified that he and his former spouse were equal business partners. Wahba testified that he believed petitioner and his former spouse were each 50-percent partners based on what petitioner's former spouse told him and his observation that they both worked at the business. Petitioner testified that Elan never issued any shares of stock and that thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011