Ed M. Fisher - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          the years in issue.  Petitioner did not file Federal income tax             
          returns for any of the years in issue.                                      
               On September 6, 1994, petitioner filed a petition with this            
          Court.  Respondent filed her answer on October 24, 1994.  On                
          December 30, 1994, petitioner filed Petitioner's Motion to Amend            
          Petition.  On January 6, 1995, petitioner filed Petitioner's                
          Amended Petition.                                                           
               The amended petition concedes the receipt of the dividend              
          and interest income attributed to petitioner in the notice of               
          deficiency.  Petitioner indicates that he received, in 1989,                
          $4,099 in dividend income; in 1990, $57,685 in dividend income              
          and $46 in interest income; in 1991, $65 in interest income; and            
          in 1992, $15 in interest income.                                            
               The parties agree that petitioner received the following               
          amounts of nonemployee compensation for the years indicated.1               
          Petitioner received $137,600 in nonemployee compensation from               
          AT&T Technologies in 1989.  Petitioner received $165,263 in                 
          nonemployee compensation from AT&T Technologies in 1990.  Peti-             
          tioner received $1,500 in nonemployee compensation from Integral            
          Technologies in 1990.  Petitioner received $97,996 in nonemployee           
          compensation from Southern California Gas in 1991.  Petitioner              
          received $7,760 in nonemployee compensation from Landbase Corp.             

          1Petitioner claims that portions of all the amounts received                
          as nonemployee compensation were reimbursement of travel                    
          expenses.  However, petitioner, presented no evidence to support            
          such a claim.                                                               




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011