Marvin F. and Patricia A. Foster - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
               On his 1993 Schedule C, petitioner returned self-employment            
          income of $16,906.  Petitioners also reported on their joint                
          Federal return Social Security benefits of $16,677.  Petitioner             
          did not report any self-employment tax on the 1993 return.                  
               Upon audit of their 1993 Federal income tax return,                    
          respondent determined that petitioners are liable for self-                 
          employment tax of $1,700.                                                   
               Petitioner contends that for 1993, he should not have been             
          "required to pay a self-employment tax or old age, survivor, and            
          disability tax on self-employed income, is because (sic) I am now           
          drawing the full entitlement under Social Security that I will              
          ever draw."                                                                 
               We have previously considered and rejected petitioner's                
          argument.  In Steiner v. Commissioner, 55 T.C. 1018 (1971), affd.           
          per curiam 72-1 USTC par. 9327, 29 AFTR2d 72-848 (D.C. Cir.                 
          1972), we held that a self-employed individual who was a "fully             
          insured individual" within the meaning of Title 42 U.S.C. sec.              
          414(a)(2) (Social Security Act), because he had over 40 quarters            
          of coverage, and accordingly, had his rights to old-age and                 
          survivor benefit payments fully vested, nevertheless was required           
          to continue to pay self-employment tax on his earnings.  We said            
          in Steiner v. Commissioner, supra at 1020: "Petitioner's argument           
          is without merit.  It finds no support in any provision of the              
          Internal Revenue Code, in any regulation of the Commissioner, in            
          any congressional report, or in any provision of the                        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011