Barry I. Fredericks - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         

               Sometime during October 1980, a representative of                      
          respondent's Manhattan District Office forwarded a Special                  
          Consent to Extend the Time to Assess Tax (Form 872-A) to                    
          petitioner and his ex-wife requesting that they extend the period           
          of limitations for the taxable year 1977 for an unlimited period.           
          Petitioner and his ex-wife executed the Form 872-A on October 17,           
          1980, and mailed it to respondent in a preaddressed envelope                
          provided for that purpose.  The Form 872-A was received by                  
          respondent's Manhattan District Office on November 3, 1980, and             
          signed by a representative of that office on November 4, 1980.              
          The printed provisions that were part of the form executed by               
          petitioner and his ex-wife provided, inter alia, that their 1977            
          taxes could be assessed by respondent at any time prior to 90               
          days following:                                                             
               1.  The receipt of a Notice of Termination of Special                  
          Consent to Extend the Time to Assess Tax (Form 872-T) by the                
          Internal Revenue Service office considering the taxpayers' case;            
               2.  the sending of such a notice of termination, Form 872-T,           
          by the Internal Revenue Service to the taxpayers; or                        
               3.  the sending of a statutory notice of deficiency to the             
          taxpayers for such period (plus the time that assessment of the             
          deficiency was prohibited by law), plus 60 days.                            
               Thereafter, in January 1981, a representative of                       
          respondent's Newark District Office contacted petitioner and                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011