- 22 - Memo. 1991-569, affd. 987 F.2d 267 (5th Cir. 1993).5 Also, we may examine how the taxpayer would have benefited from the loan or guarantee had the loan not gone bad. Tennessee Sec., Inc. v. Commissioner, 674 F.2d 570, 574 (6th Cir. 1982), affg. T.C. Memo. 1978-434. Finally, in determining the taxpayer's dominant motivation, objective facts take precedence over unsupported statements of subjective intent. Kelson v. United States, 503 F.2d 1291 (10th Cir. 1974). When a guarantor of a corporate debt is a shareholder and also an employee, mixed motives for the guaranty are often present, and the critical issue becomes which motive is dominant. United States v. Generes, supra at 100. "[I]nvesting is not a trade or business". Whipple v. Commissioner, 373 U.S. 193, 202 (1963). An employee's motive for guaranteeing a loan may be to 5 The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit stated: Generes and its progeny have established objective criteria to aid courts in their search [for dominant motive]. Our investigation centers around three factors: the size of the taxpayer's investment, the size of his after-tax salary, and the other sources of gross income available to the taxpayer at the time of the guarantees. [Garner v. Commissioner, 987 F.2d 267, 270 (5th Cir. 1993); affg. T.C. Memo. 1991-569; citation omitted.] The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit stated generally that Generes stood for the proposition that the proper characterization of a worthless debt as "business" or "nonbusiness" was a question of fact to be established by the individual circumstances of each case. Hunsaker v. Commissioner, 615 F.2d 1253, 1256 nn.3 & 4 (9th Cir. 1980).Page: Previous 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011