Lee D. Froehlich - Page 22

                                       - 22 -                                         

          Memo. 1991-569, affd. 987 F.2d 267 (5th Cir. 1993).5  Also, we              
          may examine how the taxpayer would have benefited from the loan             
          or guarantee had the loan not gone bad.  Tennessee Sec., Inc. v.            
          Commissioner, 674 F.2d 570, 574 (6th Cir. 1982), affg. T.C. Memo.           
          1978-434.  Finally, in determining the taxpayer's dominant                  
          motivation, objective facts take precedence over unsupported                
          statements of subjective intent.  Kelson v. United States, 503              
          F.2d 1291 (10th Cir. 1974).                                                 
               When a guarantor of a corporate debt is a shareholder and              
          also an employee, mixed motives for the guaranty are often                  
          present, and the critical issue becomes which motive is dominant.           
          United States v. Generes, supra at 100.  "[I]nvesting is not a              
          trade or business".  Whipple v. Commissioner, 373 U.S. 193, 202             
          (1963).  An employee's motive for guaranteeing a loan may be to             


               5 The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit stated:                   
                    Generes and its progeny have established objective                
               criteria to aid courts in their search [for dominant                   
               motive].  Our investigation centers around three                       
               factors: the size of the taxpayer's investment, the                    
               size of his after-tax salary, and the other sources of                 
               gross income available to the taxpayer at the time of                  
               the guarantees.  [Garner v. Commissioner, 987 F.2d 267,                
               270 (5th Cir. 1993); affg. T.C. Memo. 1991-569;                        
               citation omitted.]                                                     
               The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit stated generally            
          that Generes stood for the proposition that the proper                      
          characterization of a worthless debt as "business" or                       
          "nonbusiness" was a question of fact to be established by the               
          individual circumstances of each case.  Hunsaker v. Commissioner,           
          615 F.2d 1253, 1256 nn.3 & 4 (9th Cir. 1980).                               




Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011