- 17 - Nor is there evidence of any security for the debt or of any provision for interest on the debt. However, the lack of these debt characteristics is not determinative. Lack of formality may not necessarily negate the presence of a loan when related parties transfer funds. See Donisi v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1967-62, affd. 405 F.2d 481 (6th Cir. 1968). Even if interest is not paid on a debt, a bona fide debt may exist. Joseph Lupowitz Sons, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra at 868; Gilbert v. Commissioner, supra; Shaken v. Commissioner, 21 T.C. 785, 793 (1954). c. Treatment on the Trusts' Books The trusts did not treat the $82,763 as interest payments on their books. This lack of treatment on the trusts' books is not conclusive. When "the same persons occupy both sides of the bargaining table, form does not necessarily correspond to the intrinsic economic nature of the transaction, for the parties may mold it at their will with no countervailing pull." Fin Hay Realty Co. v. United States, supra at 697. d. Repayments on the Loans The estate made $82,763 of payments of interest on the loans, by paying a portion of the margin interest charged on the trusts' loan from E.F. Hutton. The handwritten notations on the E.F. Hutton statements for April through August 1984 indicate that the estate owed interest of a specified amount. The notations correspond directly to the deposits made by the trustsPage: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011