- 13 - gross income an amount in excess of 25 percent of the amount of gross income reported on their 1988 Federal income tax return, and (2) the omitted income was properly includable in gross income. See Burbage v. Commissioner, 82 T.C. 546, 553 (1984), affd. 774 F.2d 644 (4th Cir. 1985); Bardwell v. Commissioner, 38 T.C. 84, 92-93 (1962), affd. 318 F.2d 786 (10th Cir. 1963); Cruz v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1990-594; Hittleman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1990-325, affd. without published opinion 945 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1991). Respondent must introduce affirmative evidence to meet this burden of proof. The Court has stated that "the existence of bank deposits, although not explained or accounted for in a satisfactory manner, does not of itself show that the sums deposited were or were not income." Jones v. Commissioner, 29 T.C. 601, 619 (1957). However, if bank deposits are connected to a likely source of income, the Court may find that they are income. Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121 (1954); Gong Yok Tsun Chin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-54. As stated above, respondent has determined petitioners' unreported income for their 1988 taxable year by using the bank deposits method. The size and frequency of the cash deposits indicate a regular source of cash consistent with the operation of a cash-intensive business, such as print shops. Mr. Ghadiri testified that he deposited all of his proceeds from the print shops into the bank accounts. However, he admitted that hePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011