Stephen H. Glassley and Judith Glassley, et al. - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          and Kathryn G. Houser (petitioners Houser) were liable for                  
          increased interest under section 6621(c).4  Respondent concedes             
          that there is no addition to tax due from Dr. Mahoney under                 
          section 6659.                                                               
               The issues remaining for decision are:  (1) Whether                    
          petitioners are entitled to deduct losses relating to their                 
          investments in a limited partnership, Jojoba Development                    
          Partners, Ltd., which arose principally from that partnership's             
          deduction of purported research and development expenditures paid           
          or incurred during 1981; (2) whether petitioners are liable for             
          additions to tax for negligence; and (3) whether petitioners'               
          underpayments of tax are attributable to a tax-motivated                    
          transaction for purposes of computing increased interest pursuant           
          to section 6621(c).                                                         
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated, and are so found.              
          The stipulation of facts and exhibits attached thereto are                  
          incorporated herein by this reference.                                      
          A.  Background                                                              
               1.  The Jojoba Industry in General                                     
               The jojoba plant is a shrub that is native to the Sonoran              
          Desert region in Arizona, California, and Mexico.  A jojoba plant           

          4    Respondent asserted also by first amendment to answer that             
          Dr. Mahoney was liable for increased interest under sec. 6621(c).           
          Respondent had determined in the statutory notice of deficiency             
          as well that the provision for increased interest under sec.                
          6621(c) applied.                                                            



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011