Leo and Pauline Goldman - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
               These cases were consolidated for briefing and opinion, and            
          were submitted fully stipulated pursuant to Rule 122.  The                  
          stipulated facts are so found.                                              
               Petitioners resided in New Hyde Park, New York, when they              
          filed their petitions in these cases.                                       
               For the years in issue, Leo Goldman (petitioner) was a                 
          limited partner in Mid Continent Drilling Associates II (MCDA               
          II).  The additions to tax in issue relate to petitioner's                  
          investment in MCDA II.  MCDA II is one of several limited                   
          partnerships which comprise respondent's Petro-Tech National                
          Litigation Project.  Cf. Webb v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1990-             
          556.                                                                        
               The Form 1065 partnership returns filed by MCDA II for                 
          taxable years 1983 and 1984 indicate that MCDA II had more than             
          100 partners during each of those years.  The returns show that             
          petitioner held a 0.00765306 profit-sharing percentage interest             
          in MCDA II for both 1983 and 1984.  The returns also indicate               
          that MCDA II's employer identification number (EIN) was 13-                 
          3093089.                                                                    
               On October 21, 1991, respondent timely mailed separate                 
          Notices of Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment (FPAA),              
          one for taxable year 1983 and one for taxable year 1984, to the             
          tax matters partner (TMP) of MCDA II, and to Robert and Wendy               
          Lax.  As reflected in MCDA II's partnership returns, Robert Lax             
          owned a 0.01020408 profit-sharing percentage interest in MCDA II            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011