Philippe and Nadine Grelsamer - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for           
          the tax years in issue, unless otherwise indicated.  All Rule               
          references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.            
          The Court agrees with and adopts the opinion of the Special Trial           
          Judge, which is set forth below.                                            
                         OPINION OF THE SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE                           
               WOLFE, Special Trial Judge:  These cases are part of the               
          Plastics Recycling group of cases.  For a detailed discussion of            
          the transactions involved in the Plastics Recycling cases, see              
          Provizer v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-177, affd. without                
          published opinion 996 F.2d 1216 (6th Cir. 1993).  The underlying            
          transactions in these cases are substantially identical to the              
          transaction considered in the Provizer case.                                
               In a notice of deficiency dated January 11, 1990, respondent           
          determined a deficiency in the 1982 joint Federal income tax of             
          petitioners Philippe and Nadine Grelsamer and additions to tax              
          for that year under section 6653(a)(1)(A) and (B) for negligence            
          and under section 6659 for valuation overstatement (and in the              
          alternative thereto under section 6661 for substantial                      
          underpayment).  Respondent also determined that interest on                 
          deficiencies accruing after December 31, 1984, would be                     
          calculated at 120 percent of the statutory rate under section               
          6621(c).  In her answer to petition, respondent asserted a lesser           
          deficiency in the amount of $26,223 as well as reduced additions            
          to tax in the amount of $6,949 under section 6659, in the amount            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011