- 107 - Miami to meet their grandmother, Beatrice. Petitioner does not even bother to suggest a possible Sley Corporations business purpose, and we have found that the Miami trip was for a personal family vacation purpose. Betsy testified that “The reason that they [the children] went to Miami was because of the babysitter situation.” We are satisfied that respondent has shown by clear and convincing evidence that the children’s Miami trip was for personal purposes and not for Sley Corporations business, and that Markette’s payment of the cost of the airline tickets constituted constructive dividend income to Betsy, reportable on petitioner’s and Betsy’s 1985 joint tax return. We hold for respondent on this issue. Miami On February 4, 1985, Markette issued check No. 2043 to Eastern Airlines, Inc., in the amount of $1,192. On February 26, 1985, Markette issued check No. 2051 to Eastern Airlines, Inc., in the amount of $974. Apart from photocopies of the fronts and backs of the checks, totaling $2,166, the only evidence in the record as to this item is the following colloquy: Q [McDougal] If you’ll turn, please, to page 20, we will skip the Marriott invoice at the top because it does not appear to have been charged to the corporation. Mrs. Grossman, would you look at AP, the checks, the ‘85 section, check number 2043, which is about the fifthPage: Previous 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011