Robert D. Grossman, Jr. - Page 142

                                       - 85 -                                         

          Plunkett v. Commissioner, 465 F.2d at 303; Mensik v.                        
          Commissioner, 328 F.2d 147, 150 (7th Cir. 1964), affg. 37 T.C.              
          703 (1962); Stone v. Commissioner, 56 T.C. at 224.                          
               In order to establish fraud, respondent must show that                 
          petitioner intended to evade taxes, which petitioner knew or                
          believed he owed, by conduct intended to conceal, mislead, or               
          otherwise prevent the collection of taxes.  E.g., Webb v.                   
          Commissioner, 394 F.2d 366, 377 (5th Cir. 1968), affg. T.C. Memo.           
          1966-81; Powell v. Granquist, 252 F.2d 56, 60 (9th Cir. 1958);              
          Danenberg v. Commissioner, 73 T.C. 370, 393 (1979); McGee v.                
          Commissioner, 61 T.C. 249, 256-257 (1973), affd. 519 F.2d 1121              
          (5th Cir. 1975).  This intent may be inferred from circumstantial           
          evidence, Powell v. Granquist, 252 F.2d at 61; Gajewski v.                  
          Commissioner, 67 T.C. 181, 200 (1976), affd. without published              
          opinion 578 F.2d 1383 (8th Cir. 1978), including the                        
          implausibility of petitioner’s explanations, Bradford v.                    
          Commissioner, 796 F.2d 303, 307 (9th Cir. 1986), and cases there            
          cited, affg. T.C. Memo. 1984-601; Boyett v. Commissioner, 204               
          F.2d 205, 208 (5th Cir. 1953), affg. a Memorandum Opinion of this           
          Court dated Mar. 14, 1951.                                                  
               We consider first whether petitioner has an underpayment of            
          tax for any of the statute of limitations years, and then we                
          consider whether any part of that underpayment is due to fraud.             







Page:  Previous  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011