Imelda M. Hansen - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         

          Thus, the parties agreed that the tax liability of Mr. and Mrs.             
          Hansen was $3,494.05.  Of that amount, $2,356.05 had been                   
          assessed against Mr. Hansen after he failed to file a petition              
          with this Court for review of a notice of deficiency issued to              
          him with respect to his income tax for 1988.  Petitioner had a              
          withholding credit for 1988 in the amount of $2,960.90, and Mr.             
          Hansen remitted $1,270.70 in partial payment of the 1988                    
          deficiency assessed against him.                                            
               Respondent computes petitioner's available overpayment                 
          credit as follows:                                                          
              Overpayment credited from 1987 to 1988      $12,886.50                 
               Less frivolous return penalties paid          1,000.00                 
                                                            11,886.50                 
               Add one-half of 1988 withholding             1,481.00                  
                                                           13,367.50                 
               Less Mr. Hansen's deficiency                 2,346.05                  
                                                            11,021.45                 
          This computation is erroneous in that it ignores a $10 collection           
          cost.  Furthermore, petitioner should be given credit for the               
          $1,000 restored to the account.  Thus respondent's corrected                
          computation results in an available overpayment credit of                   
          $12,011.45.  To this amount we add the balance of the 1988                  
          withholding credits and subtract the deficiency to be assessed              
          ($1,138), resulting in an overpayment of $12,353.35.                        
               Petitioner contends that there are several discrepancies in            
          respondent's computation.  Petitioner contends that the                     
          overpayment credit from 1987 to 1988 should be $19,136.08 instead           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011