Hospital Corporation of America and Subsidiaries - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
               In the case of those petitioners that had employed the                 
          hybrid method of accounting for taxable years ended prior to                
          January 1, 1987, to the extent that the Uncollectible Amount was            
          attributable to the use of the cash method for taxable years                
          ended prior to January 1, 1987, each qualified petitioner reduced           
          taxable income for each of the years ended 1987 and 1988 by one-            
          tenth of the portion of accounts receivable estimated to be                 
          uncollectible as of December 31, 1986, using the modified                   
          periodic system.  To the extent that the Uncollectible Amount was           
          attributable to the use of an accrual method for taxable years              
          ended prior to January 1, 1987, the Uncollectible Amount was                
          equal to the net positive section 481(a) adjustment relating to             
          the repeal of the reserve method of accounting for bad debts.  As           
          calculated by petitioners, for taxable years ended 1987 and 1988            
          the negative section 481(a) adjustment relating to the election             
          of the nonaccrual-experience method was equal to the positive               
          section 481(a) adjustment relating to the repeal of the reserve             
          method of accounting for bad debts.                                         
               On audit, respondent disallowed all reductions in                      
          petitioners' taxable income attributable to the use of the                  
          nonaccrual-experience method, other than net writeoffs of bad               
          debts for each year, on the grounds that petitioners had failed             
          to provide documentation needed to compute the portion of                   
          petitioners' income earned from the performance of services and             
          that they had not used the proper formula in applying the                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011