Joseph M. Inman - Page 4

                                                 - 4 -                                                    
                  On October 13, 1993, a week before trial, petitioner filed                              
            his pretrial brief in which, for the first time, petitioner                                   
            argued that the entire $20,075 reported as taxable income on his                              
            1988 return had been mistakenly reflected as such by Dragna, who                              
            had prepared petitioner’s 1988 return, and that the $20,075 in                                
            reported taxable income actually represented nontaxable loan                                  
            proceeds.  Trial of petitioner’s case was continued until January                             
            of 1994 to allow petitioner time to corroborate further his new                               
            claim as to the nontaxable nature of the $20,075.                                             
                  In late December of 1993, respondent received from                                      
            petitioner documents that satisfied respondent’s representative                               
            as to the nontaxable nature of the $20,075, and in January of                                 
            1994 petitioner’s case was settled on that basis.  Petitioner                                 
            never established the deductibility of the $17,862 claimed                                    
            farming loss, and the settlement that was entered into did not                                
            reflect any deduction with regard thereto.                                                    
                  Pursuant to the settlement, we entered a decision reflecting                            
            no deficiency in income tax due from petitioner for 1988 and                                  
            reflecting no additions to tax.  When petitioner filed the                                    
            instant motion for an award of administrative and litigation                                  
            costs, we vacated our decision pending the outcome of                                         
            petitioner’s motion for administrative and litigation costs.                                  
                  Petitioner did not attach to his motion an affidavit, as                                
            required by Rule 231(b)(5), supporting his claim that he satisfied                            
            the net worth requirement of section 7430(c)(4)(A)(iii).  Moreover,                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011