Inverworld, Inc., et al. - Page 30

                                                - 118 -                                                   
            as compensation for personal services performed both in the                                   
            United States and outside the United States and is treated as                                 
            income from sources partly within and partly without the United                               
            States.  Sec. 863(b).                                                                         
                  Petitioners, however, did not provide an apportionment                                  
            scheme for the currency exchange transactions income.  The                                    
            Deloitte workpapers disclose that two income items derived                                    
            directly from the Guadalajara office's currency operations.                                   
            Accordingly, we hold that, pursuant to section 863(b), each of                                
            the Guadalajara income items is treated as income from sources                                
            without the United States, and the remaining currency exchange                                
            transactions income is treated as income from sources within the                              
            United States.                                                                                
                        e.     Sales Commissions and Fees                                                 
                               (1) Currency Fund, FEIM Fund,                                              
                                     and Matric Fund                                                      
                  Petitioners contend that the character of the commissions                               
            from the funds is compensation for investment services.                                       
            Petitioners contend that the commissions should be treated as                                 
            income from without the United States because sales of each such                              
            fund took place in Mexico.                                                                    
                  Respondent contends that the commissions should be treated                              
            as income from sources within the United States because the                                   
            investment services relating to each such fund were provided in                               
            San Antonio.                                                                                  





Page:  Previous  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011