- 175 - earned on pooled investments, LTD retained only the spread that it was able to negotiate. Accordingly, we conclude that, as to its pooled investments program, LTD was not the obligor in its relationship with its clients. Because we do not view LTD as the obligor, we treat the U.S. and foreign banks as the obligors of the interest on pooled investments paid by LTD to LTD’s clients. Additionally, we treat the interest as retaining its underlying character in the hands of LTD’s clients as interest from such U.S. and foreign banks. We turn next to whether LTD and INC are withholding agents liable for withholding tax on the interest derived from U.S. and foreign banks and paid by LTD/INC to LTD’s clients. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 changed the statutory mechanism for exempting from tax the interest earned on "deposits with persons carrying on the banking business", effective for "payments made in a taxable year of the payor beginning after December 31, 1986." Tax Reform Act of 1986 (1986 Act), Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1214 (c)(5) and (d)(1), 100 Stat. 2543.23 In the instant case, the interest from U.S. and foreign banks was paid by LTD to its clients during the calendar years 1984 through 1989. Source rules for interest are generally 23 Sec. 1012(g)(1) of the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100-647, 102 Stat. 3500, retroactively provided the effective date of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (1986 Act), Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1214(c)(5), 100 Stat. 2543, as if included in the 1986 Act.Page: Previous 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011