- 8 - that business. Furthermore, a loss was involved, a point which the Court emphasized by observing that the expenses reduced the amount of the loss and consequently the deduction. Indeed, the Court suggested that a gain might involve different treatment. See Ticket Office Equipment Co. v. Commissioner, 20 T.C. at 280 n.6. Finally, it is not without significance that Ticket Office Equipment long antedated the articulation by the Supreme Court of the "origin of the claim" doctrine, see supra p. 5. Thus, Ticket Office Equipment is clearly distinguishable, as is United States v. Pate, 254 F.2d 480 (10th Cir. 1958), which also involved business property. We hold that the legal expenses represent capital expenditures nondeductible under section 263 and an offset against the gain represented by the insurance proceeds, none of which petitioners recognized in the taxable year before us. Decision will be entered for respondent.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: May 25, 2011