Ivan A. Jasko and Judith L. Jasko - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          that business.  Furthermore, a loss was involved, a point which             
          the Court emphasized by observing that the expenses reduced the             
          amount of the loss and consequently the deduction.  Indeed, the             
          Court suggested that a gain might involve different treatment.              
          See Ticket Office Equipment Co. v. Commissioner, 20 T.C. at 280             
          n.6.  Finally, it is not without significance that Ticket Office            
          Equipment long antedated the articulation by the Supreme Court of           
          the "origin of the claim" doctrine, see supra p. 5.  Thus, Ticket           
          Office Equipment is clearly distinguishable, as is United States            
          v. Pate, 254 F.2d 480 (10th Cir. 1958), which also involved                 
          business property.                                                          
               We hold that the legal expenses represent capital                      
          expenditures nondeductible under section 263 and an offset                  
          against the gain represented by the insurance proceeds, none of             
          which petitioners recognized in the taxable year before us.                 
                                             Decision will be entered                 
                                        for respondent.                               

















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  

Last modified: May 25, 2011