Jeffrey S. Kaiser and Gail F. Kaiser - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
               During 1991 petitioner, after receiving permission from the            
          Department to do so, provided off-duty police-type services to              
          Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas, Northpark Mall, and the Parking            
          Company of America (the companies).  Petitioner voluntarily                 
          accepted off-duty employment with these companies; he was not               
          obligated to do so as a Dallas police officer.  The Department              
          did not direct him to accept such employment, and would not have            
          disciplined him if he chose not to do so.  He could quit working            
          for, or be terminated by, these companies at any time.                      
          Petitioner's off-duty work schedules were based upon the needs of           

          3(...continued)                                                             
          with the officer's assigned duties; the officer's attendance and            
          productivity records; the frequency of complaints against the               
          officer; whether the place of work is frequented by felons;                 
          whether the nature of the work would bring discredit to the                 
          Department; and whether the off-duty employment is political,               
          morally questionable, involves religious issues, conflicts with             
          police objectives, or is detrimental to the Department.                     
               Permission for off-duty employment is normally denied if,              
          for example, the officer is in training; the work is outside of             
          Dallas city limits; the officer is on limited duty status; the              
          principal business of the company involves the dispensing of                
          alcoholic beverages; the officer's supervisor determines the work           
          would limit the officer's effectiveness in discharging his                  
          official duties; the work involves collecting bills or checks;              
          the work involves domestic difficulties; the work is for an                 
          entity or company engaged in a labor dispute or political                   
          controversy such that the officer's employment may be considered            
          an endorsement or condemnation by the Department of a position of           
          either party in a controversy; the work is for a public utility             
          corporation holding a franchise from the city; or the work                  
          involves surveillance for a private security company,                       
          investigative agency, or an individual.  The Department may                 
          terminate its approval of an officer's off-duty employment if any           
          of these conditions arise after the fact.                                   
               If an officer fails to comply with the provisions of the               
          general orders, his or her supervisor may deny, suspend, or                 
          restrict the off-duty employment privileges of the officer.                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011