Jacob and Yehiella Kalo - Page 12

                                                 - 12 -                                                   
            lack of an intent to evade taxes.  We find petitioners' argument                              
            unpersuasive.  In the instant case, petitioners' understatements                              
            are both consistent and substantial; they are evidence of fraud.                              
                  c.  Failure to Maintain Adequate Books and Records                                      
                  Failure to maintain adequate books and records of income may                            
            be indicative of fraud.  Truesdell v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 1280,                             
            1302 (1987); Gajewski v. Commissioner, 67 T.C. at 200.                                        
            Respondent showed at trial that accurate records of cash receipts                             
            for petitioner's medical practice were not maintained.                                        
            Respondent contends that this along with other evidence shows                                 
            that petitioner “skimmed” profits from his medical practice.                                  
            Respondent has not convinced us that any fraud was committed by                               
            petitioner's professional corporation or by petitioner regarding                              
            the profits from that corporation; we will not, therefore, base a                             
            finding of fraud on the evidence regarding “skimming” presented                               
            in that regard.                                                                               
                  d.  Attempts to Conceal Activities                                                      
                  Petitioners contend that the principal point in their favor                             
            is that they did not attempt to conceal their assets.  They argue                             
            that if petitioners' returns for the years in issue had been                                  
            audited it would have been obvious that assets were unaccounted                               
            for and the whereabouts of those assets would have been easy to                               
            determine.  Petitioners therefore argue that because the assets                               
            and income were readily discoverable there could not have been a                              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011