Joseph M. and Sybil G. Kawal - Page 10

                                                 - 10 -                                                   
            petitioners were negligent in failing to report petitioner's                                  
            income from JMS.  Except for the amount of the compensation that                              
            petitioner received from JMS during 1992, petitioners do not                                  
            contest respondent's determination under section 6662(a).                                     
                  On the record before us, we find that petitioners are liable                            
            for 1992 under section 6662(a) for the accuracy-related penalty                               
            on the underpayment of tax attributable to $9,100 of income from                              
            JMS that petitioners did not report in their 1992 return.                                     
                  To reflect the foregoing,                                                               

                                                              Decision will be entered                    
                                                        under Rule 155.                                   



























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  

Last modified: May 25, 2011