Lawrence L. and Kathleen J. Kelter - Page 8

                                                 - 8 -                                                    

            ending injury sustained by a professional football player were                                
            not computed with reference to the nature of the football injury                              
            he sustained.  The player earned a specified benefit credit for                               
            each season he played, which was not dependent on the nature of                               
            the injuries sustained.  If appealed, our decision in this case                               
            is likely to go to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.                                
            In affirming our decision in the Beisler case, the Court of                                   
            Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said:  “We conclude that benefit                                
            payments, to be excludable from gross income under section                                    
            105(c), must be made under a plan that varies benefits according                              
            to the type and severity of the injury incurred.”  Id. at 1307.                               
            Turning to the facts of the case before it, the Court of Appeals                              
            for the Ninth Circuit said:                                                                   
                  Mr. Beisler's benefit payments necessarily fail to                                      
                  qualify for exclusion under section 105(c)(2).  Rather                                  
                  than computing benefit amounts with reference to the                                    
                  type and severity of the injury, the NFL Plan, upon a                                   
                  showing of substantial disablement, determines them                                     
                  solely on the basis of the number of seasons played.                                    
                  The fact that the NFL Plan compensates only the most                                    
                  severe permanent injuries (those subsumed under the                                     
                  term "substantial disablement") does not cure this                                      
                  section 105(c)(2) defect. * * *  The plan makes no                                      
                  attempt to distinguish among the various "substantial                                   
                  disablements," even though the types and severity of                                    
                  these injuries can vary greatly.  The NFL Plan thus                                     
                  does not compute the amount of its disability payments                                  
                  with reference to the nature of the injury.  [Id. at                                    
                  1309; emphasis added.]                                                                  
            III.  Discussion                                                                              
                  The payments in question here (the plan distributions)                                  
            equaled 100 percent of petitioner’s accrued benefits under the                                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011