Thomas E. King - Page 6

                                                    6                                                     
                        (1) constitute payment for the permanent loss or loss                             
                        of use of a member or function of the body, or the                                
                        permanent disfigurement, of the taxpayer * * * and                                
                        (2) are computed with reference to the nature of the                              
                        injury without regard to the period the employee is                               
                        absent from work.                                                                 
            Each prong of section 105(c) must be satisfied before payments                                
            are excluded.  Beisler v. Commissioner, 814 F.2d 1304 (9th Cir.                               
            1987) affg. en banc T.C. Memo. 1985-25.                                                       
                  Neither the statute nor the legislative history precisely                               
            describes the injuries that constitute permanent loss of a                                    
            "function of the body".  However, section 1.105-3, Income Tax                                 
            Regs., provides examples of qualifying injuries:                                              
                  For purposes of section 105(c), loss or loss of use of a                                
                  member or function of the body includes the loss or loss of                             
                  use of an appendage of the body, the loss of an eye, the                                
                  loss of substantially all of the vision of an eye, and the                              
                  loss of substantially all of the hearing in one or both                                 
                  ears. * * *                                                                             
                  Petitioner contends that he has lost the use of his right                               
            ankle and foot based on his inability to run, stand for long                                  
            periods of time, walk up or down stairs without difficulty, or                                
            dance.  Petitioner testified that his condition is degenerative                               
            with no hope of recovery, and, therefore, qualifies as a                                      
            permanent loss of a function of the body.  In the alternative,                                
            petitioner contends that his heart condition qualifies as a loss                              
            of a body function in that a valve in his heart is not                                        
            functioning properly, thereby compromising his heart muscle.                                  
            Petitioner's testimony appears to be in conflict with the 1992                                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011