Janet Kline - Page 2

                                                 - 2 -                                                    
            1984 income tax, pursuant to section 6653(a)(1) and (2), in the                               
            amounts of $200 and $2,756, respectively.   The additions to tax                              
            are attributable to a partnership loss from the American Indian                               
            Venture Capital Partnership (the partnership) that was claimed on                             
            the 1983 joint income tax return and carried forward to the 1984                              
            return.  The underlying adjustments relating to the partnership                               
            were resolved in American Indian Venture Capital v. Commissioner,                             
            docket No. 17697-87.  A timely petition was filed in response to                              
            the statutory notice issued on April 3, 1992.  At the time of                                 
            filing the petition herein, petitioner resided in Ellicott City,                              
            Maryland.                                                                                     
                  Petitioner, through her attorney, Peter Driscoll, filed a                               
            petition for redetermination on July 9, 1992.  Petitioner argued                              
            that she is not liable for the additions to tax because she is an                             
            innocent spouse within the meaning of section 6013(e).                                        
            Petitioner also argues that the statute of limitations bars                                   
            assessment and collection of the tax.                                                         
                  On September 4, 1992, respondent filed an answer to the                                 
            petition in which she denied all substantive allegations of fact                              
            and error and affirmatively alleged as a defense that the statute                             
            of limitations does not bar assessment and collection of the                                  
            deficiency due for the taxable year 1984.  Respondent alleged as                              
            follows:                                                                                      


            and Procedure.                                                                                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011