Julian P. Kornfeld - Page 6

                                                 - 6 -                                                    
                  When purchased bonds were redeemed, each party to the                                   
            agreements received their proceeds based upon the actuarial                                   
            values thereof published by the Internal Revenue Service.  The                                
            values are not disputed by respondent.                                                        
                  At issue is the right of petitioner to amortize, ratably                                
            over his expected life, his cost of acquiring his life interests                              
            in bonds purchased pursuant to joint purchase agreements.                                     
            Petitioner argues that he purchased his interests and that the                                
            other participants acted independently in purchasing their                                    
            interests.  Respondent contends that:  (1) While, in form, the                                
            purchases were by petitioner and the other participants, i.e.,                                
            petitioner's daughters and secretary, in substance, petitioner                                
            purchased the bonds as a whole, retaining life interests for                                  
            himself and donating the remaining4 interests to the other                                    
            participants with the result that (2) petitioner split                                        
            nondepreciable assets and is not entitled to an amortization                                  
            deduction.  We dealt with the same issue in Gordon v.                                         
            Commissioner, 85 T.C. 309 (1985), in which we sustained                                       
            respondent's contentions and rejected the taxpayer's claim of an                              
            amortization deduction, and in Richard Hansen Land, Inc. v.                                   
            Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-248, where we applied Gordon and                                
            rejected respondent's contentions and sustained the taxpayer's                                

            4  We use the word "remaining" instead of "remainder" because of                              
            the secondary life interest of Nancy in some of the bonds and the                             
            fact that the proper characterization of that interest is in                                  
            question.  See infra pp. 13-14.                                                               




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011