Jack J. Kramer - Page 1

                                         T.C. Memo. 1996-513                                              


                                      UNITED STATES TAX COURT                                             


                        JACK J. KRAMER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF                                     
                                   INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent                                           
                    JACK S. KRAMER1 AND MAXINE C. KRAMER, Petitioners v.                                  
                         COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent                                     


                  Docket Nos. 22785-90, 22457-91.    Filed November 19, 1996.                             

            Sidney A. Soltz,2 for petitioners.                                                            
                  Stanley P. Kaplan,3 for petitioner in docket No. 22785-90.                              


            1Although the petition in the case at docket No. 22457-91                                     
            was filed on behalf of petitioners Jack S. Kramer and Maxine C.                               
            Kramer, Jack S. Kramer and Jack J. Kramer are the same person.                                
            2Mr. Soltz filed the original petitions on behalf of                                          
            petitioners in both cases.  At trial, he made an oral motion in                               
            the case at docket No. 22457-91 to dismiss for lack of juris-                                 
            diction as to Maxine C. Kramer.  Mr. Soltz died after trial                                   
            without filing a brief on behalf of petitioners.                                              
            3Although at trial Mr. Kaplan entered his appearance on                                       
            behalf of Jack J. Kramer in the case at docket No. 22785-90, he                               
            represented petitioner only as a transitional figure after Mr.                                
            Soltz's illness and eventual death; he did no substantive work on                             
            petitioner's case and eventually withdrew as counsel.                                         


Page:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011