- 16 -16 The deficiency resulted from the following adjustments to their income: Description 1987 Gross receipts $1,661,551 Interest expense-Sch. C 116,321 Schedule C expenses: attorney 225,054 Schedule C expenses: La Posta 37,286 Schedule E: Fall Mansion 40,202 Capital gains and losses 407,576 Itemized deductions (11,351) The bases for the adjustments made in the notices of deficiency were the conclusions formed by Agent Red as a result of his examinations. V. The Docketed Cases The petitions were filed in these cases on February 27, 1992. In each case petitioners assigned error to all of the adjustments made in the notices of deficiency. With respect to the omitted income adjustment, in her petition Lawrence alleged that "the revenue agent used the bank deposit method to determine that petitioner had realized additional income without any inquiry of petitioner to identify the nature of the deposits." Likewise, the Abrahams, in an amendment to their petition, alleged that the "unreported income was determined under the bank deposit plus cash expenditure method without inquiry into non-taxable transfers and loans, noPage: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011