- 6 - a petition with this Court expired on July 13, 1994, which is 90 days from the date of the deficiency notice. Sec. 6213(a). Discussion It is well settled that, in order to maintain an action in this Court, there must be a valid notice of deficiency and a timely filed petition. Abeles v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 1019, 1025 (1988). Section 6212(a) authorizes the Secretary or his delegate, upon determining that there is a deficiency in income tax, to send a notice of deficiency "to the taxpayer by certified mail or registered mail." Section 6212(b)(1) provides that a notice of deficiency, with respect to any income tax, "shall be sufficient" if it is "mailed to the taxpayer at his last known address". Respondent is entitled to treat the address on the taxpayer's most recently filed return as the last known address absent "clear and concise notification" of a new address. Abeles v. Commissioner, supra at 1035; see also United States v. Zolla, 724 F.2d 808, 810 (9th Cir. 1984). Where respondent, before mailing a notice of deficiency, becomes aware of an address other than the one on the taxpayer's return, respondent must exercise reasonable care and due diligence in ascertaining the taxpayer's correct address. Monge v. Commissioner, 93 T.C. 22, 33-34 (1989). Petitioners agree that the notice of deficiency was mailed to their last known address. They contend, however, that:Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011