The Church of the Living Tree - Page 7

                                          7                                           
          is being furthered is one of fact.  Christian Stewardship                   
          Assistance v. Commissioner, 70 T.C. 1037, 1042 (1978); Christian            
          Manner International v. Commissioner, 71 T.C. 661, 668 (1979).              
          The question of whether net earnings inure to the benefit of a              
          private shareholder or individual is also one of fact.  Unitary             
          Mission Church v. Commissioner, 74 T.C. 507, 514 (1980), affd.              
          without published opinion 647 F.2d 163 (2d Cir. 1981).                      
               As we consider the administrative record in this case that             
          has been presented by the parties, we come to the conclusion that           
          petitioner has failed to carry its necessary burden of proof to             
          show that it has been and is being operated exclusively for                 
          exempt purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3).  As is             
          made clear by the statement in petitioner's application for                 
          exemption, which we have quoted, the primary purpose of the                 
          organization is to plant trees, with a secondary purpose to                 
          promote and establish the industry of papermaking, perhaps using            
          alternative materials other than paper from wood pulp.                      
          Petitioner has not shown that its objective to encourage the                
          papermaking industry is a public and charitable purpose.                    
               Further, there is no showing in this record that                       
          petitioner's net income does not serve private purposes and does            
          not accrue to the benefit of individuals.  What information is              
          provided--and we concede that this present petitioner seems to be           
          only in the initial or "shell" stages--is that John Stahl, his              
          wife, and children are afforded rent-free housing on petitioner's           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011