Janice L. Morris - Page 31

                                       - 31 -                                         
          contends that those funds were significant enough that, under the           
          circumstances surrounding petitioner, she should have been put on           
          notice that an inquiry or investigation into the source of those            
          funds was warranted.  Because petitioner did not make any such              
          inquiry, respondent argues that she should be held responsible.             
          Petitioner disagrees.                                                       

          23(...continued)                                                            
          in the record that establishes why Accu-Data made those payments            
          to GMAC during 1987 or that petitioner in any way benefited from            
          those payments.  Petitioner testified that on May 12, 1987, she             
          purchased a 1987 Sunbird, which was the only car available to her           
          at that time, by making a downpayment of $6,263.50 and borrowed             
          the balance of the purchase price for that car.  Since petitioner           
          did not purchase the 1987 Sunbird until May 12, 1987, the monthly           
          payments that she made to GMAC during the period January through            
          May 1987 could not have related to that car.  It appears that the           
          probable source of the funds that petitioner used to make the               
          downpayment on that Sunbird was Accu-Data.  However, we have                
          found that checks totaling at least $11,775 that were drawn on              
          the Accu-Data account were paid to the order of petitioner, Mr.             
          Morris, or cash and represented amounts received by or expended             
          on behalf of petitioner during 1987 and that petitioner included            
          at least $11,450 of those checks in the deposits analysis that              
          she prepared for 1987.                                                      
          With respect to the availability to petitioner during 1988 and              
          1989 of the funds in certain bank accounts of Meadows, although             
          petitioner was a signatory on both of those accounts and signed a           
          check for $100 drawn on the Meadows account at the Champaign                
          National Bank to pay the premium on a liability insurance policy            
          for the Illinois land, we have found that during the years at               
          issue Mr. Morris controlled the affairs of Meadows and that                 
          petitioner was not involved in its day-to-day operations.  We               
          believe petitioner's testimony that, to her knowledge, she did              
          not sign any other checks drawn on the Meadows bank accounts.  In           
          this regard, although petitioner and Mr. Morris opened a savings            
          account at American Savings during 1989 by depositing $20,000               
          from the joint checking and/or savings accounts and $15,000 from            
          the Meadows account at the National Bank of Monticello, peti-               
          tioner testified that the money deposited into that account was             
          used by Meadows for the gravel pit and that she did not receive             
          any of that money.                                                          




Page:  Previous  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011