Horace E. McCann - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         

          the respective amounts of $2,394 and $479.  At the time the                 
          petition was filed petitioner resided in Birmingham, Alabama.               
               The issues are whether petitioner is (1) entitled to                   
          deductions in amounts greater than those allowed by respondent              
          for charitable contributions, employee business expenses, and               
          other miscellaneous deductions, and (2) liable for an accuracy-             
          related penalty for negligence under section 6662(a).                       
               The facts may be summarized as follows.  Petitioner is an              
          employee of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration               
          (OSHA).  On Schedule A of petitioner's 1991 Federal income tax              
          return petitioner claimed deductions for the following:                     
               Charitable Contributions                     $3,125                    
               Miscellaneous Employee Business Expenses     4,088                     
               Other Miscellaneous Deductions               5,821                     
          Upon examination respondent disallowed portions of the claimed              
          deductions as follows:                                                      
                                                       Allowed  Disallowed            
               Charitable Contributions                $2,040    $1,085               
               Miscellaneous Employee Business Expenses  1,814   2,274                
               Other Miscellaneous Deductions          670    5,151                   
               The primary difficulty with this case is that, although                
          petitioner prepared his return for 1991, he cannot identify with            
          any specificity items of contributions or expenses he claimed.              
          He had no documentation with regard to the disallowed amounts.              
          Furthermore, his testimony was unclear and often evasive.                   







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011