- 12 - 1989 Date Amount Location Purchased Apr. 20 $3,000 Commerce Savings June 8 9,000 Commerce Savings June 8 10,000 Bank of Alex Brown June 12 9,000 Wells Fargo June 14 1,432 Wells Fargo June 14 2,594 Wells Fargo Respondent concedes that the source of the $10,000 cashier’s check would not result in income to McDonald. McDonald’s wife remitted three checks to Maynard during 1989 in the following amounts: $995.90, $550, and $699.50. McDonald’s daughter also remitted a $2,500 check to Maynard during 1989. OPINION Procedural Question--Initially, we consider petitioners’ procedural argument that the notices of deficiency are "arbitrary and capricious". Petitioners argue that respondent should have the burden of going forward with the evidence because respondent’s determination is arbitrary and capricious and that respondent’s determination should not enjoy a presumption of correctness. See Jackson v. Commissioner, 73 T.C. 394, 403 (1979); Weimerskirch v. Commissioner, 596 F.2d 358, 361 (9th Cir. 1979), revg. 67 T.C. 672 (1977). By contending that the notices are arbitrary, petitioners are essentially asking us to look behind the notices of deficiency to examine the evidence used by respondent in making her determinations. Riland v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 185, 201 (1982); Jackson v. Commissioner, supra at 400; Greenberg's Express, Inc. v. Commissioner, 62 T.C. 324, 327Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011