Medieval Attractions N.V - Page 40

                                       - 127 -                                        
          goodwill in the form of tradenames and trademarks that, according           
          to petitioners' form, the obligee did not own.                              
               We do not believe outside investors would have made similar            
          advances.  The notes were unsecured, and the "leased" intangibles           
          were 98 percent and 83 percent of the total value of MDT and MSI,           
          respectively.  In the event petitioners were unable to repay, a             
          creditor would have little, if any, chance of recovering the                
          loan.  Additionally, an outside investor would want to have the             
          "value" of the entities substantiated.  The "value" of MANV                 
          increased from $6,174,800 on January 31, 1987, to $14 million on            
          September 30, 1987.                                                         
               Although tax savings motives are not given conclusive                  
          weight, they should be given weight commensurate with the extent            
          to which "they contribute to an understanding of the external               
          facts of the situation."  Gilbert v. Commissioner, 248 F.2d at              
          407.  The facts overwhelmingly support that the motive for the              
          section 351 transactions was tax avoidance.  The finalization of            
          every document was predicated on tax rulings from various foreign           
          entities.  The corporate planning was centered around methods to            
          repatriate funds without paying tax.  As we discussed previously,           
          the form to avoid taxes was created by petitioners and C&L, and             
          the documents were created to fit that form, notwithstanding the            
          substance of the arrangements.                                              
               The preponderance of the evidence supports the conclusion              
          that the funds were placed at the risk of the business and                  




Page:  Previous  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011