Medieval Attractions N.V - Page 58

                                       - 143 -                                        
          calculating understatements, items for which there was                      
          substantial authority or adequate disclosure are not to be                  
          considered.  Secs. 6661(b)(2)(B)(i) and (ii), 6662(d)(2)(B)(i)              
          and (ii).                                                                   
               Petitioners argue that there was no understatement, and, if            
          the Court determines that there was a substantial understatement,           
          the addition to tax should be waived because there was reasonable           
          cause for the understatement and petitioners acted in good faith.           
               We are not persuaded that petitioners acted in good faith or           
          that they had reasonable cause for the understatements.                     
          Petitioners' failure to submit Forms 5472 was an attempt at                 
          concealment, not disclosure.  Accordingly, respondent's                     
          determination will be sustained.                                            
               B.  Increased Interest                                                 
               Former section 6621(c) applies to tax returns with a due               
          date prior to December 31, 1989, and provides for an increase in            
          the rate of interest on underpayments.  The rate is increased to            
          120 percent of the statutory rate on underpayments that exceed              
          $1,000 and are attributable to tax-motivated transactions.                  
          Tax-motivated transactions include "any sham or fraudulent                  
          transaction."  Sec. 6621(c)(3)(A)(v).                                       
               Petitioners argue that they are not liable for the increased           
          rate because they did not engage in any sham or fraudulent                  
          transactions.  We have previously concluded that petitioners                
          engaged in several tax-motivated transactions that lacked                   




Page:  Previous  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011