Estate of Philip Meriano, Deceased, Anita Panepinto, Administratrix - Page 18

                                       - 18 -                                         
          market value of the recovered stolen bonds; i.e., 35 percent of             
          $1,146,466 or $401,256.10.                                                  
               In the Amendment to the Account filed by Boote with the                
          Court on April 30, 1986,6 a total of $500,761.19 was credited to            
          Lynch.                                                                      
               Judge Shoyer surcharged Lynch the difference between                   
          $500,761.19 (the amount retained by Lynch after his payment of              
          $220,000 to Reardon) and $401,256.10 for a surcharge of                     
          $99,505.09.  He also specifically surcharged Lynch $7,500 which             
          Lynch had advanced for "costs" on February 16, 1980, because                
          Lynch never properly accounted for the claimed "costs".                     
               Panepinto, Lynch, and Reardon took exceptions to Judge                 
          Shoyer's Adjudication of September 21, 1988, and the matter was             
          heard by the Orphans' Court sitting en banc.                                
               On August 1, 1989, Judge Pawelec issued the Opinion and                
          Order of the Orphans' Court, sitting en banc.  The Opinion and              
          Order provided, inter alia, as follows:                                     
                THE AMOUNT OF THE "SURCHARGES" ENTERED AGAINST LYNCH                  
                 AND REARDON, THE ALLOWANCE OF CREDITS TO LYNCH FOR                   
                 PAYMENTS TO OTHERS, AND THE INTEREST TO BE PAID ON                   
                                  THE "SURCHARGES"                                    
                    It is apparent from a review of the briefs and the                
               arguments of counsel for the exceptants that they are                  
               unclear concerning the exact amount of the "surcharges"                
               imposed by the auditing judge upon Lynch and Reardon,                  
               the credits, if any, to be allowed Lynch for his                       
               payments to others, and the interest to be paid on the                 
               surcharges by Lynch and Reardon.  To allay counsels'                   

          6         See supra note 4.                                                 




Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011