Michelle Bird Meyers - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         

               After concessions by respondent,2 the issues for decision              
          are:  (1) Whether petitioner has unreported wage income of                  
          $12,031.22; (2) whether petitioner is entitled to certain medical           
          and unreimbursed employee business expense deductions; and                  
          (3) whether the interest due on any deficiency in petitioner's              
          Federal income tax for 1981 may be abated.                                  
               Some of the facts were stipulated, and those facts, with the           
          annexed exhibits, are so found and are incorporated herein by               
          reference.  At the time the petition was filed, petitioner's                
          legal residence was Sacramento, California.                                 
               Petitioner did not file a Federal income tax return for                
          1981.  During 1981, petitioner received wages from the following            
          employers in the following amounts:                                         

                    Employer                         Wages                            
               Lasher Service Corp.          $ 5,842.91                               
               Swift Chevrolet                    670.82                              
               Inland Business Machines           5,517.49                            
               Total                            $12,031.22                            

               In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined                     
          petitioner's taxable income and income tax deficiency based on              
          single filing status, one personal exemption, and the income                
          information received from the payers shown above.                           


          2                                                                           
               Respondent concedes that petitioner is entitled to head of             
          household filing status and a dependency exemption for her son              
          for 1981.                                                                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011