Fred and Yvonne Michael - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          purposes of calculating a net operating loss carryover.  Accord-            
          ing to the Court of Appeals:  "An item of expense is not deduct-            
          ible as a business expense merely because it arose in connection            
          with the taxpayer's business and was proximately related thereto.           
          To be deductible, it must be an ordinary and necessary expense              
          incurred in the operation of the business".  Id. at 602-603.  The           
          Court of Appeals' view of the type of situations in which                   
          interest on a deficiency may be deducted as an ordinary and                 
          necessary expense arising out of the operation of a business is             
          reflected in the following statement:                                       
               Unless it can be said that the failure to properly                     
               evaluate inventories, which form a part of a taxpayer's                
               return, arises because of the nature of the business,                  
               and is ordinarily and necessarily to be expected,                      
               interest on a deficiency assessment does not arise out                 
               of the ordinary operation of the business and may not                  
               be deducted.  [Fn. ref. omitted.]                                      
          Id. at 603.  This Court in Redlark v. Commissioner, supra at 37,            
          noted that the above-quoted language might have been intended to            
          "[narrow] the types of situations where the ordinary and                    
          necessary business expense requirement of section 162 has been              
          satisfied."  In Redlark, however, we indicated that the Court of            
          Appeals for the Tenth Circuit's test was met under the specific             
          facts presented.  We must now decide whether the facts of the               
          present case also meet the Court of Appeals' test.                          
          Failure To Pay Self-Employment Tax                                          
               Petitioner believed that, for the tax years 1981 and 1982,             
          he was an employee and therefore not liable for self-employment             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011