Ronald L. and Deborah L. Miller - Page 2

                                          2                                           
          entitled to deduct various expenses claimed on their Schedule C             
          in excess of the amounts allowed by respondent.  Petitioners                
          resided in Dallas, Texas, at the time their petition was filed.             
               Ronald L. Miller (petitioner) is engaged in the business of            
          tax preparation and consulting, doing business under the name of            
          Express Tax Service.  He holds an associate degree in arts and              
          science with an accounting emphasis from Eastfield College, and a           
          bachelor of science degree in accounting from the University of             
          Texas at Dallas.  On January 15, 1989, petitioner commenced a 1-            
          year lease of an office located at 8541 Ferguson Road in Dallas,            
          Texas.  The terms of the lease provided for a monthly rent of               
          $535, to be increased to $650 if the lease was renewed, and                 
          utilities to be paid by petitioner.  According to petitioner, at            
          the conclusion of the lease, he and his landlord, referred to in            
          the record only as Dr. Cantrell, orally agreed to renew the lease           
          for 1 year and to maintain the rent payments of $535.  There is             
          no written documentation of this agreement.                                 
               On the Schedule C filed with his 1990 return, petitioner               
          claimed deductions for various business expenses including $1,188           
          for rental of a printer, $6,420 for rent of the office space,               
          $2,544 for utilities, and $2,764 for the cost of a software                 
          program.  In the notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed each           
          of the above deductions for lack of substantiation.                         
               We begin by noting that, as a general rule, the                        
          Commissioner's determinations are presumed correct, and the                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011