Elizabeth B. Miller - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         

                    Petitioner               Year2          Deficiency                
                    Elizabeth B. Miller      1989      $31,500                        
                    Robert N. Miller III3    1989      31,500                         
               The issues remaining for decision in these cases are:                  
               (1)  Was each of the two $50,000 transfers that petitioner             
          Elizabeth B. Miller4 made during 1982 to her son Stephen Miller a           
          transfer by gift for purposes of section 2501(a)?  We hold that             
          it was.                                                                     
               (2)  Was the $100,000 transfer that petitioner Elizabeth B.            
          Miller made during 1982 to her son Robert N. Miller IV a transfer           
          by gift for purposes of section 2501(a)?5  We hold that it was.             

          1(...continued)                                                             
          in effect for the years relevant to the transactions at issue.              
          All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and              
          Procedure.                                                                  
          2  By virtue of the operation of the unified credit under sec.              
          2505, respondent determined deficiencies for 1989 even though the           
          basis for those deficiencies relates to transfers made during               
          1982.                                                                       
          3  Respondent's determinations against petitioner Robert N.                 
          Miller III, who is and was during the years relevant to the                 
          transactions at issue the spouse of petitioner Elizabeth B.                 
          Miller, result solely from his being treated as having made gifts           
          by operation of sec. 2513(a)(1).  Under that section, a gift by             
          one spouse to a third person is treated as made one-half by that            
          spouse and one-half by the spouse of that spouse, provided that             
          both spouses have consented to such treatment as provided in sec.           
          2513(a)(2) and (b).                                                         
          4  Hereinafter, references to petitioner are to Elizabeth B.                
          Miller.                                                                     
          5  Petitioner issued a $100,000 check to Robert N. Miller IV on             
          Oct. 4, 1982.  That check was not presented for payment until               
          January 1983.  Petitioners do not claim, and respondent does not            
                                                             (continued...)           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011