- 2 - all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. After concessions, the issues remaining for decision are whether petitioners are entitled to deduct losses from farming claimed on amended returns for the years in issue; whether mortgage interest and property taxes paid by petitioners are properly deducted on Schedule A or on Schedule F of their returns; whether petitioners are entitled to deduct a net operating loss carryforward from 1989; whether petitioners are entitled to depreciation expense and legal expense deductions on Schedule C; whether petitioners can change from the cash to the accrual method of accounting on their Schedules C and F where respondent’s permission was neither sought nor secured; and whether petitioners are liable for the penalties for negligence. FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts have been stipulated, and the stipulated facts are incorporated in our findings by this reference. Petitioners resided in Boerne, Texas, at the time that they filed their petition. Petitioner Dan S. Mitchell (Mr. Mitchell) is a certified public accountant who operates a sole proprietorship known as Mitchell & Associates. Petitioner Nancy J. Mitchell (Mrs. Mitchell) is a secretary with an accounting firm. On November 24, 1986, petitioners purchased a 113.205-acre rural property in Kendall County, Texas (the real property), which includes a residence. Since its purchase, petitioners havePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011