MTS International, Inc. - Page 8

                                                - 8 -                                                  

            corporation (By:  Robert Hughes, President).  Minkow’s and ZZZZ                            
            Best’s financial statements were false.                                                    
                  Petitioner examined ZZZZ Best’s financial statements in mid                          
            to late June 1987 and concluded that its balance sheets were                               
            unusually skewed toward accounts receivable.  He believed that                             
            nearly 80 percent of ZZZZ Best’s assets were receivables.  He                              
            concluded that ZZZZ Best’s “nominal balance” did not match the                             
            total amount of receivables.  Petitioner corporation did not buy                           
            ZZZZ Best receivables because petitioner could not verify the                              
            source of the receivables.                                                                 
                  On June 23, July 13, and July 24, 1987, petitioner sold the                          
            70,000 shares of ZZZZ Best stock he bought in June.  His sale                              
            price was $45,270.72, and his loss was $633,540.68.                                        
            C.    Minkow’s Conviction and ZZZZ Best Class Action Suit                                  
                  In June 1988, Minkow and other officers of ZZZZ Best were                            
            charged with the crimes of conspiracy, unauthorized use of access                          
            devices, money laundering, interstate transportation of stolen                             
            securities and money, and securities, mail, bank and tax fraud.                            
            Minkow was convicted early in 1989.                                                        
                  At various times not specified in the record, petitioner                             
            contacted the attorneys who represent the plaintiffs in the                                
            shareholder class action suit.  A recovery agreement on the class                          
            action suit was reached in 1991.  It was signed by the parties in                          
            July 1994.                                                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011