Ronald J. Murphy - Page 1

                                       T.C. Memo. 1996-258                                             


                                     UNITED STATES TAX COURT                                           


                              RONALD J. MURPHY, Petitioner v.                                          
                        COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent                                   
                                 DIANE D. MURPHY, Petitioner v.                                        
                        COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent                                   


                  Docket Nos. 3201-94, 8531-94.       Filed June 5, 1996.                              


                        Petitioner husband (H) and petitioner wife (W)                                 
                  were divorced.  Subsequently, H was directed by a                                    
                  California court to pay monthly "family support"                                     
                  payments (the marital payments) to W.  H deducted the                                
                  marital payments as alimony pursuant to sec. 215,                                    
                  I.R.C.  W did not report the marital payments as gross                               
                  income pursuant to sec. 71, I.R.C.  R disallowed H's                                 
                  deduction and included the marital payments in W's                                   
                  income.                                                                              
                        1.  Held:  The marital payments are not alimony;                               
                  therefore H may not deduct such payments, and W need                                 
                  not include them in gross income.                                                    
                        2.  Held, further, R's determination of penalties                              
                  under sec. 6662, I.R.C., against H is sustained.                                     









Page:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011