- 2 - and adopts the Opinion of the Special Trial Judge, which is set forth below. OPINION OF THE SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE NAMEROFF, Special Trial Judge: This case is before the Court on respondent's Motion To Dismiss For Failure To State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted, filed pursuant to Rule 40. Respondent further moved for the imposition of sanctions pursuant to section 6673. Petitioner resided in Los Alamitos, California, at the time the petition was filed in this case. Respondent by a notice of deficiency dated March 13, 1995, determined deficiencies in, and additions to, petitioner's Federal income taxes for the taxable years 1989, 1990, and 1991 as follows: Additions to tax Year Deficiency Sec. 6651(a)(1) Sec. 6654(a) 1989 $16,054 $4,014 $1,084 1990 7,923 1,981 521 1991 13,206 3,172 725 The deficiencies in income tax (including self-employment tax) are based on respondent's determination that petitioner failed to file income tax returns for the taxable years before the Court and had gross income, as reconstructed by respondent, in the respective amounts of $48,337, $29,724, and $40,696. Respondent further determined that petitioner had unreported interest in 1989 of $343 and Form W-2 wages in 1991 in the amount of $3,800 (of which $517 was withheld). The additions to taxPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011